Showing posts with label refugees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label refugees. Show all posts

Friday, March 4, 2022

NATO to Ukraine: Resistance Is Futile, You Will Be Assimilated -- By Russia


Reuters reports
:

NATO allies rejected Ukraine’s demand for no-fly zones on Friday, saying they were increasing support but that stepping in directly would lead to a broader, even more brutal European war so far limited to Russia’s assault on its neighbour.

Meanwhile, during an interview with German public broadcaster ZDFGermany's Chancellor, Olaf Scholtz said: 

“Ukraine’s membership is not on The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)’s agenda.” 
 Furthermore, Scholtz stated that  he had made it clear in Moscow: 
“... that this option [Ukraine’s membership of NATO] is not on the table and will not take place ...

While not publicly stated, one can be sure that a further consideration in the minds of NATO allies is resistance throughout the West to being made host to a growing multitude of Ukrainian war refugees, already exceeding one million in number.

The message to Ukraine is clear: call it quits -- end the bloodshed which, however valorous, must end in Ukrainian defeat. 

Related:





CJ. Hopkins: Revenge of the Putin-Nazis!











The Unintended Consequences of the West’s Response to Russia’s Invasion


Grave New World: The Soft Tyranny of Tomorrow

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Danes Reject Race Replacement by Mass Immigration

Denmark, like all the Euro majority nations, has a below replacement fertility rate, yet in recent years, the country has had a substantial influx of refugees and immigrants. Danes, the people whose ancestors have inhabited Denmark for dozens of generations past, have thus, like other European-majority nations, been in the process of replacing themselves with people from elsewhere.

But apparently Danes have now opted to abandon this suicidal path. Instead, they have decided to require interlopers, whether refugees or economic migrants, to return whence they came. As a consequence, it may be expected that the population of Denmark will in the immediate future decline. However the absence of migrants will have many economic consequences including a rise in wages as labor competition is reduced, and a decline in housing demand and hence house prices. The consequence of these changes will be earlier and easier household formation, and likely, therefore, a rise in the birth rate until the population either stabilizes, or resumes growth through multiplication of the indigenous people of the country.

Thus, as the Voice of Europe reports:

In the future, the focus will be on sending migrants back to the third world – instead of “integrating” them.

The focus will be shifted from integration to the return of refugees to their home countries
whenever possible, said Peter Poornima, the Danish People’s Party’s group leader in Folketinget when the agreement was presented last autumn.

The settlement also means that criminal migrants will be placed on a deserted island, that the so-called integration subsidy is reduced, that the number of family reunions for migrants will be limited, that residence permits as a rule becomes temporary and that it will be easier to withdraw permits and refrain from extending them.

The package of legislation is the result of a settlement between the right-wing government and the Danish People’s Party.

Together, the parties have a majority in Parliament. However, the Social Democrats will also vote for the changed rules.

According to the Danish Minister of Finance Kristian Jensen, Denmark will no longer have a system in which “refugees become immigrants”.
So contrary to the policy of  the great majority of the Euro nations, the Danes have opted to continue their own race. There must be a few drops of Viking blood in Danish veins yet.

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Haaretz: Most Israelis Oppose Accepting Refugees


Haaretz: September 20, 2018: WASHINGTON – A clear majority of Israelis oppose accepting refugees from war-torn countries into Israel, according to a new poll released on Wednesday by the Pew Research Institute. The poll included respondents from 18 different countries, and among the Israelis surveyed by it, 57 percent were against accepting refugees – more than in any other country included in the survey.

Nothing unreasonable about Israelis opposing an influx of refugees. Man is a territorial animal. Each nation has a territorial base. If Israelis, Brits, French or Germans move over to make way for people of other nationalities, their own nation is diminished.

When one is talking of a few thousand fleeing for their lives, few are opposed to their own country taking in refugees. But when nations that have a below replacement fertility rate, as is true of all the European nations, are expected (i.e., compelled by their own leadership) to take in "refugees" by the million, people naturally become resistant.

Moreover, when the "refugees" aggressively assert the supremacy of their own culture over that of the natives of the land where they have sought haven, it becomes obvious that the natives have been betrayed by a treasonous, globalist and anti-democratic leadership, and are set for destruction as a racial and cultural entity.

So Israelis are perfectly rational and morally justified in resisting the influx of "refugees" most of whom are likely, in any case, to be economic migrants not victims of war. To do otherwise would be to place their own national survival in jeopardy.

One just wishes that Jews would remember that the same right of refusal applies to other countries. They would then, perhaps, not be so loud in their seemingly endless criticism of the countries such as Canada, the US, Britain that failed to offer safe haven to six million European Jews prior to, and during, WW2.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

European Genocide: The Final Phase

The Iris Savant wonders whether the flood of millions of Middle-Eastern and Asian Muslim refugees now pouring into Europe has not been instigated as a pretext for a radical reorganization of the European Union, involving creation of a unified military command and a European treasury to dictate a continent-wide monetary and fiscal policy.

This could well be true, but the refugee invasion serves not only to provide a pretext for radical political reorganization in Europe, but also to undermine the indigenous populations as the dominant groups within the Union, thereby creating a voting majority against a return to a Europe of nation states. Already the EU-wide immigrant population outnumbers the indigenous population of any single European nation, thereby giving a democratic edge to those of alien origin, race and religion.

Furthermore, a rapid upsurge in immigration seems a necessity if the program for the destruction of the European people's is to be assured of success. Already Britain verges on departure from the EU, an impetus driven by opposition to the EU's open borders policy. Evidently Europe's oppressed, indigenous lumpen proletariat is beginning to geddit.  They may not know the exact meaning of the word genocide, but they know they've being targeted for oppression and ultimate elimination.

So with the natives restless, what to do?

No prob. Bomb the shit out of whoever, to use the language of America's leading candidate to succeed President O'Bomber, and bring in the Muslim refugees. Then all that needs be done is plug the alien invaders into the welfare state and just watch as they multiply like maggots on a festering corpse.

Game over.

Democracy triumphs over whatever the "racist", "xenophobic," "far-right-wing extremist," Guardian-despised rump "nativist" population may think, say, or do.

The European peoples are soon be the oppressed minority, while Parliaments come to be dominated by representatives of the new European Islamic State. Perhaps those disaffected Brits, Krauts and Frogs who dislike this prospect should join forces with America's Red Indians and Australia's aborigines: a confederation of moribund, and a memorial to lost human diversity.

Related:

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Swedish Feminists To Syrian Refugees: When Does the Raping Begin?

Betty Friedan. Image source
I've sometimes wondered if feminists, the female variety, that is, are not in most cases just women resentful at not being, for whatever reason, the target of at least occasional male sexual harassment.

If that were the case, the mass influx of strong, young, sex-starved, single, Islamic males intent on rape and pillage across Europe would naturally appeal to at least a certain segment of the feminist establishment. And so it appears to be the case. Or at least so it has been reported from Sweden where feminists  have launched a campaign against men that want to protect them from being raped by "Syrian" "refugees."

This, in turn, seems to confirm the genocidal intention of the US-orchestrated mass influx of young, strong, single, sex-starved Muslim males from Syria (aka, draft dodgers and economic opportunists) and elsewhere into Europe. As we noted before:
Germany has less than five million female citizens between the ages of 20 and 30, so by opening the door to one million young, Islamic males, with millions more to come, the Merkel government has cuckolded (a large part of) the male youth of Germany.

German demographics

 Presumably the intention is to follow this with ever more energetic promotion of homosexuality as an outlet for the cucked, while welcoming Islam, a faith that sanctions the brutal execution of homosexuals, as a religion of peace and love eminently compatible with European civilization.
To better understand the psychology underlying this project for the ethnic destruction of Europe, consider what would be the reaction of European males to mass influx of young, healthy unaccompanied, sex-starved females from Asia and the Middle-East.

Exactly: wild enthusiasm.

Related:

Sweden: Death By Immigration